Evolution of India-US Relations: A Geopolitical Analysis (1947–2026)

The bilateral relationship between the Republic of India and the United States of America has undergone a profound transformation, evolving from what were once termed “estranged democracies” into a “consequential partnership” that anchors the stability of the Indo-Pacific region. This engagement is characterized by a bidirectional influence: global geopolitical shifts—such as the transition from Cold War bipolarity to the current era of multipolar competition—have fundamentally reoriented the bilateral priorities of Washington and New Delhi, while the deepening of India-US ties has, in turn, reshaped global security architectures, technology standards, and maritime norms.¹ Tracing this evolution from the independence of India in 1947 to the contemporary strategic landscape reveals a complex interplay of ideological divergence, economic integration, and a current state of high-end technological and defense convergence.¹

Historical Antecedents and the Pre-Independence Context

While formal diplomatic relations were established in 1947, the historical and cultural linkages between the two nations extend back to the early modern era. The very discovery of the Americas by Christopher Columbus in 1492 was a consequence of a search for a sea route to India, a historical misnomer that has persisted through the centuries in the nomenclature used for indigenous American populations.¹ During the American Revolution, the Founding Fathers maintained an awareness of affairs in the Indian subcontinent, particularly admiring the resistance of the Kingdom of Mysore against British colonial expansion.¹ The flag of the East India Company is widely believed to have inspired the design of the Continental Union Flag of 1775, which eventually evolved into the current flag of the United States.¹ Furthermore, the technological exchange was evident even in the late 18th century; Mysorean rockets utilized against the British were later adapted by the British and used in the Battle of Baltimore, eventually being immortalized in the “rockets’ red glare” mentioned in the US national anthem.¹

Under the British Raj, interactions remained limited, yet cultural exchanges were significant. In the 19th and early 20th centuries, figures such as Swami Vivekananda and Rabindranath Tagore influenced American intellectual life, while Mahatma Gandhi’s philosophy of non-violence was deeply inspired by American writers like Henry David Thoreau and, in turn, profoundly influenced the American Civil Rights Movement led by Martin Luther King Jr..¹ These early interpersonal and ideological connections provided a latent foundation for the bilateral relationship that would be formally inaugurated upon India’s independence.¹

The Cold War Paradigm: Ideological Divergence and Strategic Estrangement (1947–1991)

The establishment of formal diplomatic ties in 1947 coincided with the onset of the Cold War, a period that would define the relationship through the lens of ideological conflict and strategic suspicion.¹ The fundamental challenge was a mismatch in worldviews: the United States viewed the international order through the prism of anti-communism and the containment of the Soviet Union, whereas India, emerging from nearly two centuries of colonial rule, viewed the world through the prism of anti-imperialism and the preservation of newly won sovereignty.⁶

The Non-Alignment Doctrine and the Ideological Gulf

Led by Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, India became a founding member of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) in 1961, seeking to avoid formal alignment with either power bloc while pursuing a neutral and independent foreign policy.¹ Nehru’s approach was both idealistic and functionally pragmatic; he believed that the primary threat to India was not communism but the entanglement in the conflicts of superpowers, which would drain resources from domestic development.⁶ During his 1949 visit to the United States, Nehru met with President Harry S. Truman, setting a tone of diplomatic independence that Washington often interpreted as an ideological challenge or even tacit support for the Soviet bloc.⁵

The American perspective, articulated through the “with us or against us” doctrine of Secretary of State John Foster Dulles, found little room for India’s “neutrality”.⁶ Consequently, the US sought regional pillars of strength, eventually enlisting Pakistan as a critical ally in the containment of the Soviet Union in Asia through its membership in SEATO and CENTO.⁶ This “tilt” toward Pakistan created a strategic chasm, as India viewed US military assistance to its neighbor as a direct threat to its security.⁶

Fluctuations in Cooperation and the Sino-Indian Factor

Despite the overarching political distance, the relationship experienced significant moments of cooperation driven by shared interests. Between 1951 and 1963, India received approximately $8 billion in economic grants from the United States, largely aimed at fostering democratic stability and preventing the spread of hunger-driven communism.⁹ The 1962 Sino-Indian border war served as a critical inflection point, as a desperate Nehru wrote to President John F. Kennedy requesting air assistance and arms.⁵ The American response was prompt and warm, recognizing the McMahon Line as the border and providing military support, which briefly fostered a sense of strategic convergence between the two democracies.⁴

However, this rapprochement was short-lived. The 1965 India-Pakistan war led the US to adopt a position of strict neutrality, which India perceived as a betrayal given Pakistan’s use of US-supplied equipment.⁶ The relationship deteriorated further during the 1971 East Pakistan crisis. President Richard Nixon and National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger, who engaged in a “opening to China” that utilized Pakistan as a conduit, viewed India’s intervention in the Bangladesh Liberation War as a threat to their global strategy.⁶ The dispatch of the USS Enterprise aircraft carrier task force to the Bay of Bengal as a coercive signal against India pushed New Delhi into a 20-year Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation with the Soviet Union, marking the peak of India-US estrangement.⁵

Key Historical Phase	Predominant Geopolitical Driver	Primary Area of Friction	Notable Cooperation/Outcome
1947–1954	Emergence of Bipolarity	Non-Alignment vs. Containment	US Economic Assistance Act (1948)
1954–1962	Regional Bloc Formation	US-Pakistan Alliance	US Support during 1962 War
1963–1971	Sino-Soviet Split	1965 & 1971 Indo-Pak Wars	The Green Revolution (1963)
1974–1991	Nuclear Non-Proliferation	1974 “Smiling Buddha” Test	IIT Kanpur Indo-American Program

The Nuclear Divide and Functional Resilience

The 1974 “Smiling Buddha” underground nuclear test by India created a systemic rift, as it challenged the emerging global non-proliferation regime that the US was championing.⁶ Washington responded by imposing stringent technological and economic sanctions, a move that would define the bilateral dynamic for the next two decades.¹⁰ Yet, even during this period of “nuclear apartheid,” functional cooperation continued in niches. The partnership in higher education remained robust; the Kanpur Indo-American Program, which involved nine American universities and USAID, was pivotal in establishing the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Kanpur, fostering a generation of technical talent that would eventually fuel the American IT sector.⁵ Similarly, the collaboration between Norman Borlaug and Indian scientist M.S. Swaminathan triggered the Green Revolution, transforming India from a food-scarce nation into a self-sufficient one within a decade.⁵

The Post-Cold War Pivot: From Estrangement to Engagement (1991–2008)

The collapse of the Soviet Union and the subsequent end of the bipolar world order in 1991 forced a fundamental reassessment of foreign policy in both New Delhi and Washington.¹ India, facing a severe balance-of-payments crisis, embarked on a path of economic liberalization and deregulation led by Finance Minister Manmohan Singh.⁵ This shift opened the door for a new era of bilateral relations grounded in economic interdependence and the recognition of shared democratic values in a unipolar world.¹

Economic Liberalization and the Tech Convergence

The 1991 reforms catalyzed a transition from a state-led, quasi-socialist economy toward a market-oriented one, making India an attractive destination for US foreign direct investment (FDI) and a massive market for American multinational corporations.⁵ A critical, albeit unintentional, catalyst for this transition was the Y2K anxiety at the turn of the century. American companies turned to Indian IT professionals to address potential software failures, allowing Indian tech firms to gain a lasting foothold in the US services market.⁷ This established the foundation for the United States to become India’s largest export destination for both goods and IT services, as well as a primary source of remittances.⁷

Trade & Investment Metric	1990–91 Baseline	2000–01 Post-Reform	2024–25 (Cumulative/Current)
US Share in India’s Exports	~15%	21%	Remains largest export market 7
Total Bilateral Trade	~$5 Billion	~$15 Billion	$212 Billion (2024) 7
US FDI in India (Cumulative)	Negligible	~$1 Billion	$71 Billion (2000-2025) 7

Even as the 1998 nuclear tests (Pokhran-II) led to a brief reimposition of sanctions, the relationship demonstrated a newfound resilience.⁵ India’s ability to navigate these sanctions by issuing “Resurgent India Bonds,” which raised $4 billion and restored global confidence, signaled the country’s economic maturity.⁷ Recognizing India’s rising status, the George W. Bush administration began the process of de-hyphenating India and Pakistan, viewing India as a responsible global power and a critical partner in the post-9/11 “War on Terror”.¹

The Civil Nuclear Deal: A Systemic Inflection Point

The 2008 India-US Civil Nuclear Agreement (the “123 Agreement”) represents perhaps the most significant strategic breakthrough in the history of the relationship.² By granting India a unique waiver from the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) requirements, the United States effectively recognized India as a “de facto” nuclear weapon state despite its refusal to sign the NPT.¹⁹ This deal was a masterstroke of strategic altruism from the American perspective, intended to bring India into the international non-proliferation regime as a partner rather than an outsider.²⁰

For India, the agreement was not only a source of clean energy to fuel its growing economy but also a symbolic end to decades of technological isolation.¹⁹ It allowed India to separate its civil and military nuclear facilities, placing the former under permanent IAEA safeguards in exchange for access to global nuclear fuel and technology.¹⁶ Systemically, the deal signaled that Washington regarded India as a pivotal player in the global order, setting the stage for the strategic realignment that would accelerate in the subsequent decade.¹

Strategic Realignment in the Modi Era: The Indo-Pacific and Beyond (2014–Present)

Since 2014, the relationship has entered a phase of rapid acceleration under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and successive US administrations.¹ This period has been characterized by a profound convergence of interests in the Indo-Pacific region, driven primarily by the shared challenge posed by a more assertive and revisionist China.³

The Indo-Pacific Construct and the Quad

The shift from the “Asia-Pacific” to the “Indo-Pacific” as a strategic framework has been the most consequential geopolitical development for India-US ties.⁴ By integrating the Indian and Pacific Oceans into a single maritime realm, the United States acknowledged India’s central role in the regional balance of power.⁴ The “Pivot to Asia” (Obama administration) and the subsequent “Free and Open Indo-Pacific” strategy (Trump and Biden administrations) sought to cultivate India as a “critical regional security pillar”.⁴

The revival and elevation of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad)—comprising India, the United States, Japan, and Australia—to the summit level serves as a primary vehicle for this coordination.¹ While India continues to emphasize its “strategic autonomy,” there is a growing consensus in New Delhi that alignment with the US is a strategic necessity to balance against Chinese hegemony, which is viewed as the greatest threat to India’s freedom of action.¹³ This shift is reflected in India’s transition from a “Look East” policy to a more proactive “Act East” policy, aligning with the US-led vision for a rules-based regional order.²²

Strategic Autonomy in a Multipolar World

Despite this convergence, India maintains a nuanced approach to its external partnerships. The doctrine of “strategic autonomy” has evolved from its non-aligned roots into a “mutation of realism” that prioritizes independent decision-making while leveraging multiple partnerships.¹³ India participates in organizations that are sometimes viewed as counter-weights to the West, such as BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), while simultaneously deepening its “Comprehensive Global Strategic Partnership” with the US.¹ This dual strategy allows India to position itself as a “bridge” between the West and the Global South, especially as US policy becomes more transactional and less predictable under successive administrations.²⁵

Defense Convergence: Foundational Pacts and Industrial Integration

The defense domain has transitioned from a buyer-seller relationship into a deep strategic partnership characterized by high-end technology transfers and operational interoperability.¹ In 2016, the United States designated India as a “Major Defense Partner,” a status unique to India that enables it to receive the same level of technology access as America’s closest allies and partners.¹

The Foundational Agreements and Their Systemic Impact

A critical pillar of this cooperation is the signing of the four “foundational” defense agreements, which provide the legal and technical framework for sustained military-to-military engagement.³⁰ These agreements have systemically altered the security architecture of the Indian Ocean Region (IOR) by enhancing the interoperability of Indian and US forces.

Foundational Agreement	Year Signed	Strategic/Operational Significance	Systemic Impact on Global Norms
GSOMIA	2002	Information security for classified exchanges.	Establishes a baseline for secure strategic communication.
LEMOA	2016	Reciprocal logistics and refueling support.	Extends India’s naval reach to US bases in Djibouti, Guam, and Diego Garcia.
COMCASA	2018	Encrypted, real-time tactical data transfer.	Enables a “common tactical picture” and Netcentric warfare capabilities.
BECA	2020	Exchange of high-end geospatial intelligence.	Augments precision-strike capabilities through real-time satellite data.

The impact of these agreements is most visible in the maritime domain. For instance, the signing of the COMCASA and BECA has enabled the Indian Navy to utilize advanced encryption technologies on its US-origin P-8I maritime reconnaissance aircraft, allowing for real-time data sharing and high-end anti-submarine tracking of Chinese vessels in the Indian Ocean.¹⁵ Furthermore, the LEMOA has transformed India’s stance from an individual regional influencer to a part of a larger, coordinated maritime security effort, facilitating joint naval and air exercises like “Malabar” that serve as a collective deterrent against maritime assertiveness.²⁴

Co-production and the DTTI Framework

Beyond operational cooperation, the focus has shifted toward defense industrial collaboration. The Defense Technology and Trade Initiative (DTTI) aims to move beyond simple procurement toward the co-development and co-production of military hardware.⁸ Landmark deals, such as the co-production of General Electric F-414 jet engines in India and the purchase of MQ-9B Sea Guardian drones, represent a paradigm shift.³² This collaboration is central to India’s “Atmanirbhar Bharat” (Self-Reliant India) initiative, which seeks to build a domestic defense manufacturing base through technology transfers and joint ventures.²⁴

Technological Alignment: The iCET and Semiconductor Resilience

As technology becomes the primary frontier of global competition, India and the United States have institutionalized their cooperation through the Initiative on Critical and Emerging Technologies (iCET).³⁵ Launched in 2023 and led by the National Security Councils of both nations, the iCET aims to bridge innovation ecosystems in fields such as artificial intelligence, quantum computing, space exploration, and semiconductors.³⁵

Diversifying Global Semiconductor Supply Chains

The semiconductor industry is a focal point of this technological pivot. With a global supply chain currently concentrated in East Asia—leaving it vulnerable to “geopolitical exposure” and physical risks like earthquakes—India and the US are working toward “strategic redundancy”.³⁸ This involves the relocation of manufacturing capabilities to India, supported by financial incentives like the $10 billion India Semiconductor Mission.³⁵

Major US firms, including Micron, GlobalFoundries, and Lam Research, have committed to establishing OSAT (outsourced semiconductor assembly and test) and design facilities in India.³⁵ India, which already accounts for 20% of the world’s chip engineers, is being positioned as a “stabilizing node” in the global technology value chain, offering a trusted and resilient production alternative to China.³⁵ The September 2024 announcement of the Bharat Semi-US Space Force fabrication plant exemplifies this high-end collaboration, tying India’s manufacturing potential to US national security requirements.³⁵

AI Governance and the “Third Way” for the Global South

In the realm of Artificial Intelligence (AI), India and the US are collaborating to define global standards and governance models. While the US leads in frontier model development, India offers a unique perspective through its “Digital Public Infrastructure” (DPI) model, which emphasizes scale and financial inclusion under resource-constrained environments.⁴⁰ India is advocating for a “third way” in AI governance—one that avoids the closed, state-centric model of China and the purely market-driven model of the US, instead focusing on “AI for All” and the democratization of technology.⁴⁰

This cooperation is further bolstered by the “TRUST” (Transparency of Research Underpinning Social Intervention Tiers) initiative, which aims to ensure that AI and semiconductor supply chains are secure from high-risk vendors.³⁵ India’s signature of the “Pax Silica”—the American-led pact on AI and semiconductor supply chain security—consolidates this geopolitical realignment, even as India pushes for the “frugal AI” tradition that prioritizes ecological integrity and energy efficiency.⁴¹

Economic Interdependence and Persistent Frictions

The economic pillar of the relationship remains both a driver of convergence and a source of persistent friction. The United States has been among India’s top investors and remains its largest export destination, with total bilateral trade in goods and services reaching $212 billion in 2024.⁷ However, the return of a more transactional US trade policy under the Trump administration has introduced “geopolitical shocks,” including threats of unilateral tariffs and the labeling of India as a “tariff king”.¹

Trade Barriers and the Tariff Debate

Persistent frictions exist over trade imbalances, intellectual property rights (IPR), and India’s refusal to liberalize sensitive sectors such as agriculture and dairy.¹⁸ The US withdrawal of India’s GSP (Generalized System of Preferences) benefits in 2019 led to retaliatory tariffs, highlighting a nuanced strategy where both nations negotiate “quietly” while maintaining “hardened” public rhetoric.⁷

Despite these headlines, the “China Plus One” strategy pursued by many American firms continues to benefit India, as it presents an alternative manufacturing hub.²⁶ The US-India Investment Initiative and the “Innovation Handshake” are designed to lower barriers for startups and high-tech sectors, aiming to reach a bilateral trade target of $500 billion.⁷

Key Economic Challenge	US Perspective	Indian Perspective	Potential Resolution
High Import Tariffs	Views India as protectionist; seeks market access for ag/ICT.	Protects MSMEs and agriculture; emphasizes “Atmanirbhar Bharat.”	Negotiating multi-sectoral trade agreements.7
IPR Enforcement	Claims Indian laws are weak and harm US business interests.	Maintains compliance with WTO norms; reviews laws through think tanks.	Formation of high-level joint working groups.22
Services & Visas	Seeks to protect domestic labor; restrictive H1-B policies.	Services (IT) are India’s strength; seeks mobility for professionals.	Continued dialogue on the “Innovation Handshake”.7

Energy and Climate Diplomacy

Energy security and the clean-energy transition have emerged as pivotal areas of international collaboration. India’s ambitious target of achieving 500 GW of non-fossil-fuel capacity by 2030 is closely aligned with US climate goals.⁴⁴ The India-led International Solar Alliance (ISA), headquartered in Gurugram, serves as a global platform for this cooperation, mobilizing finance and standardizing solar technology for more than 120 member countries.⁴⁴

The US withdrawal from the ISA in 2026 under the Trump administration highlighted the volatility of US domestic politics, yet the alliance’s day-to-day functioning remains insulated due to its broad-based membership and India’s leadership.⁴⁶ India continues to rapidly expand its domestic solar manufacturing capacity under the Production Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme, aiming to become a global exporter of green hydrogen and solar modules.⁴⁴

Global Geopolitical Friction: The Russia-Ukraine Context

The most significant contemporary challenge to India-US strategic alignment has been the Russia-Ukraine war.²⁷ India’s refusal to unconditionally condemn the Russian invasion or join Western sanctions has been a point of contention in Washington.²⁷

Navigating Strategic Ambivalence

India’s response is guided by “pragmatic neutrality” and the principles of “strategic autonomy”.²⁷ For New Delhi, Russia remains a vital source of affordable energy and a critical defense supplier, providing nearly half of India’s current arsenal—a legacy of Cold War-era ties.²⁷ Furthermore, India views Russia as a “continental balancer” against China; maintaining ties with Moscow is seen as essential to prevent it from falling completely into Beijing’s embrace.⁴⁹

Diplomatically, India has required the US to accept its neutrality, arguing that its strategic importance in the Indo-Pacific outweighs the divergence on Ukraine.⁵⁰ The US has largely acquiesced, avoiding direct pressure on the Modi government while focusing on the broader goal of containing China.²⁸ India, in turn, has utilized its G20 presidency and its role in the Global South to highlight the impact of the war on food and energy security, positioning itself as a mediator and a voice for inclusive international order.²⁷

Conclusion: The Trajectory of a “Natural Ally”

The relationship between India and the United States has evolved from a state of ideological estrangement to a robust strategic partnership that is redefined by its bidirectional influence on the global order.¹ The “consequential partnership” is anchored by three primary pillars: a shared democratic identity, an deepening economic and technological interdependence, and a common strategic interest in balancing the rise of China in the Indo-Pacific.¹

While structural contradictions—such as India’s continued ties with Russia and persistent trade frictions—ensure that the relationship will not become a formal treaty alliance, the degree of high-end defense and tech convergence achieved through iCET and the foundational agreements is unprecedented.¹³ As India continues to pursue its “strategic autonomy” and the United States recalibrates its global presence, the ability of both nations to manage their differences while deepening their cooperation in critical domains will determine the future of the 21st-century international system.¹⁸ The bilateral engagement has moved beyond simple cooperation to become a stabilizing node in a fragmented global economy, offering a new model of partnership between a global superpower and a rising middle power.²⁵

Works cited

1. India–United States relations – Wikipedia, accessed March 21, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/India%E2%80%93United_States_relations
2. India-USA Relations: An Analytical Study of the Current Situation and Key Challenges – IJFMR, accessed March 21, 2026, https://www.ijfmr.com/papers/2025/6/64494.pdf
3. US-India Relations: A Shifting Landscape – The Indo-Pacific Studies Center, accessed March 21, 2026, https://www.indo-pacificstudiescenter.org/commentaries/us-india-relations-shifting-landscape
4. Introduction: India and the Rebalancing of Asia, accessed March 21, 2026, https://www.iiss.org/online-analysis/online-analysis/2025/09/introduction-india-and-the-rebalancing-of-asia/
5. U.S.-India Relations | Council on Foreign Relations, accessed March 21, 2026, https://www.cfr.org/timelines/us-india-relations
6. India-US Relations: The Shock of the New, accessed March 21, 2026, https://lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/docs/default-source/faculty-publications/the_shock_of_the_new_india-us_relations.pdf?sfvrsn=70c2930b_0
7. Trajectory of India-US Economic Relations – India-United States …, accessed March 21, 2026, https://www.natstrat.org/articledetail/publications/trajectory-of-india-us-economic-relations-219.html
8. Indo-US Relations: An Overview since 1947 – Social Research Foundation, accessed March 21, 2026, https://socialresearchfoundation.com/upoadreserchpapers/6/450/21121202345914%20794%20dhiraj%20kumar%20gupta.pdf
9. R.D. Nisar I. India-US Relations During the Cold War – RUDN UNIVERSITY SCIENTIFIC PERIODICALS PORTAL, accessed March 21, 2026, https://journals.rudn.ru/public-administration/article/download/23551/18122
10. (PDF) India-US Relations Through the Lens of Cold War: The Time of Estranged Relations (Brief Overview) – ResearchGate, accessed March 21, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341061225_India-US_Relations_Through_the_Lens_of_Cold_War_The_Time_of_Estranged_Relations_Brief_Overview
11. Indo- US Relations in Post Cold War era: From Non- alignment to Engagement – Jetir.Org, accessed March 21, 2026, https://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR1904C22.pdf
12. Cold War Years: The Roller-Coaster of India-US Relations – PolSci Institute, accessed March 21, 2026, https://polsci.institute/india-foreign-policy/cold-war-india-us-relations/
13. Strategic Autonomy and U.S.-Indian Relations – War on the Rocks, accessed March 21, 2026, https://warontherocks.com/2020/11/strategic-autonomy-and-u-s-indian-relations/
14. The Swift Changes in the US-India Relations and Manifestation in the Indo-Pacific Region – Journal of Development and Social Sciences, accessed March 21, 2026, https://ojs.jdss.org.pk/journal/article/download/1224/1144/1903
15. U.S.-India Maritime Futures: The Upper Limits of Security Burden …, accessed March 21, 2026, https://perryworldhouse.upenn.edu/news-and-insight/u-s-india-maritime-futures-the-upper-limits-of-security-burden-sharing-in-the-indian-ocean/
16. Hushed Hope – India, the Nuclear Deal, and Nonproliferation – The EU Non-Proliferation Consortium, accessed March 21, 2026, https://nonproliferation.eu/india-the-nuclear-deal-and-nonproliferation/
17. THE EVOLUTION OF INDIA-US RELATIONS AND INDIA´S GRAND STRATEGY – UNISCI, accessed March 21, 2026, https://www.unisci.es/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/UNISCIDP49-5STEPHEN.pdf
18. U.S.-India Insight: Beyond Optics: India’s New Strategic-Commercial Linkages – CSIS, accessed March 21, 2026, https://www.csis.org/analysis/us-india-insight-beyond-optics-indias-new-strategic-commercial-linkages
19. India–United States Civil Nuclear Agreement – Wikipedia, accessed March 21, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/India%E2%80%93United_States_Civil_Nuclear_Agreement
20. Enhancing India’s Role in the Global Nonproliferation Regime – CSIS, accessed March 21, 2026, https://www.csis.org/analysis/enhancing-indias-role-global-nonproliferation-regime
21. U.S.-India Civil Nuclear Cooperation Initiative – state.gov, accessed March 21, 2026, https://2001-2009.state.gov/p/sca/rls/fs/2008/109567.htm
22. India-U.S. Relations: Repaired, Revived, Revitalized – Brookings Institution, accessed March 21, 2026, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/india-u-s-relations-repaired-revived-revitalized/
23. More Prominence for India and the Indo-Pacific in the U.S. National Security Strategy, accessed March 21, 2026, https://www.cfr.org/articles/more-prominence-india-and-indo-pacific-us-national-security-strategy
24. The Impact of the India-US Growing Strategic Partnership on South …, accessed March 21, 2026, https://globalsecurityreview.com/the-impact-of-the-india-us-growing-strategic-partnership-on-south-asia/
25. India: Leaning to One Side (Cautiously) | The Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, accessed March 21, 2026, https://www.belfercenter.org/research-analysis/india-leaning-one-side-cautiously
26. From Threats to Substance: Decoding India-US Relations, accessed March 21, 2026, https://instituteofgeoeconomics.org/en/research/2025082001/
27. (PDF) Global South Diplomacy: India’s Leadership Aspirations and the Ukraine War as a Test of South–South Solidarity – ResearchGate, accessed March 21, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/400304484_Global_South_Diplomacy_India’s_Leadership_Aspirations_and_the_Ukraine_War_as_a_Test_of_South-South_Solidarity
28. India and China on the War in Ukraine: A Comparative Analysis – Stosunki Międzynarodowe, accessed March 21, 2026, https://internationalrelations-publishing.org/articles/5-2/pdf
29. Forum: The Russia–Ukraine War and Reactions from the Global South | The Chinese Journal of International Politics | Oxford Academic, accessed March 21, 2026, https://academic.oup.com/cjip/article/17/4/449/7769649
30. Gsomia, Lemoa, Comcasa and Beca: The “Foundational” Agreements – Ijaresm, accessed March 21, 2026, https://www.ijaresm.com/gsomia-lemoa-comcasa-and-beca-the-foundational-agreements
31. The COMCASA question in India-US military relations – Observer Research Foundation, accessed March 21, 2026, https://www.orfonline.org/research/43831-comcasa-question-us-india-military-relations
32. A Contemporary Assessment of the Maritime Impact of the India-US Foundational Agreements, accessed March 21, 2026, https://maritimeindia.org/a-contemporary-assessment-of-the-maritime-impact-of-the-india-us-foundational-agreements/
33. EVOLVING INDO-US NAVAL COOPERATION IN LIGHT OF BECA, COMCASA AND LEMOA AGREEMENTS – Salute Magazine, accessed March 21, 2026, https://salute.co.in/evolving-indo-us-naval-cooperation-in-light-of-beca-comcasa-and-lemoa-agreements/
34. United States – India Joint Leaders Statement – U.S. Embassy & Consulates in India, accessed March 21, 2026, https://in.usembassy.gov/united-states-india-joint-leaders-statement/
35. IP26015 | The Future of India–US Tech Supply Chain Security …, accessed March 21, 2026, https://rsis.edu.sg/rsis-publication/idss/ip26015-the-future-of-india-us-tech-supply-chain-security-cooperation/
36. iCET: Upscaling India-US partnership for a tech-centric future, accessed March 21, 2026, https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/icet-upscaling-india-us-partnership-for-a-tech-centric-future
37. India-U.S. Emerging Technologies Working Group | Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, accessed March 21, 2026, https://carnegieendowment.org/india/collections/india-us-emerging-technologies-working-group
38. Strategic Redundancy in Semiconductor Supply Chains: How US-India Cooperation Transforms Global Chip Resilience – The SAIS Review of International Affairs, accessed March 21, 2026, https://saisreview.sais.jhu.edu/strategic-redundancy-in-semiconductor-supply-chains-how-us-india-cooperation-transforms-global-chip-resilience/
39. PacNet #79 – The case for greater US-India semiconductor cooperation – Pacific Forum, accessed March 21, 2026, https://pacforum.org/publications/pacnet-79-the-case-for-greater-us-india-semiconductor-cooperation/
40. India, AI, & America’s New ‘Global South’ Strategy, accessed March 21, 2026, https://indiacurrents.com/india-ai-americas-new-global-south-strategy/
41. The norm in global AI governance right now is performance and scale; India can rewrite that, accessed March 21, 2026, https://www.downtoearth.org.in/science-technology/the-norm-in-global-ai-governance-right-now-is-performance-and-scale-india-can-rewrite-that
42. What India’s Push for Global Digital Repositories Tells Us About Its Tech Diplomacy, accessed March 21, 2026, https://www.techpolicy.press/what-indias-push-for-global-digital-repositories-tells-us-about-its-tech-diplomacy/
43. AI: The Squandered Opportunity in India – CircleID, accessed March 21, 2026, https://circleid.com/posts/ai-the-squandered-opportunity-in-india
44. Renewable Energy: How international collaboration is accelerating India’s solar and green hydrogen push, accessed March 21, 2026, https://www.investindia.gov.in/team-india-blogs/renewable-energy-how-international-collaboration-accelerating-indias-solar-and
45. International Solar Alliance (ISA) – PIB, accessed March 21, 2026, https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2071486
46. India-led International Solar Alliance to keep working with 125 countries to meet objectives, accessed March 21, 2026, https://m.economictimes.com/industry/renewables/india-led-international-solar-alliance-to-keep-working-with-125-countries-to-meet-objectives/articleshow/126416509.cms
47. How Will the U.S Exit Affect the International Solar Alliance? – KP IAS Academy, accessed March 21, 2026, https://kpiasacademy.com/how-will-the-u-s-exit-affect-the-international-solar-alliance/
48. International Solar Alliance Reflects Power of Global Partnership Says Mr Pralhad Joshi on ISA Foundation Day – Change Started, accessed March 21, 2026, https://changestarted.com/international-solar-alliance-reflects-power-of-global-partnership-says-mr-pralhad-joshi-on-isa-foundation-day/
49. “Mediating the Ukraine Crisis: Can India’s Non-Alignment Bridge the Divide? Global South Implications” – IJHSSM.org, accessed March 21, 2026, https://ijhssm.org/issue_dcp/Mediating%20the%20Ukraine%20Crisis%20Can%20India%20s%20Non%20Alignment%20Bridge%20the%20Divide%20%20Global%20South%20Implications.pdf
50. IMPACT OF WAR IN UKRAINE – Friedrich Naumann Foundation, accessed March 21, 2026, https://www.freiheit.org/sites/default/files/2023-02/india-revised-paper.pdf
51. How India’s Role in US Indo-Pacific Strategy Diminished | Hudson …, accessed March 21, 2026, https://www.hudson.org/foreign-policy/how-indias-role-us-indo-pacific-strategy-diminished-aparna-pande